Obama ' s Hunt For A Bipartisan Fig Leaf On Health Care

Obama ' s Hunt For A Bipartisan Fig Leaf On Health Care

Over the course of 2009 conservatives and Republicans have done a far better job than anyone would have thought possible when it came to blocking ObamaCare from becoming law. Everyone thought it was a fait accompli, but it ran into the maroon wall of public view.

In light of the recent elections in Virginia, New Pullover and Massachusetts, as well as his own falling poll numbers, Obama wants Republicans to come together with Democrats for a grand health care " summit " to search for a bipartisan adjudication. In other words, he wants some cover.

But even as Obama and Democrat leaders have publicly pressured Republicans about glad eye their summit, they ' ve spent hours in private backrooms planning to get around a Republican filibuster and pass their bill by resorting to the legislative trick of the budget reconciliation process.

So much for bipartisanship.

The truth is that liberals are desperate. They ' ve seen the polls and they know that it ' s time for them to branch out as much government as they can before voters have a chance to head to the polls and turn Washington on its ear this November.

They understand that the current versions of the bill may not be their idea of liberal nitty-gritty, but it certainly represents one of the best opportunities they ' ve ever had to lock in the biggest expansion of government in living reminiscence. It means more bureaucrats, more government jobs, more regulations and more control over how people can live their lives. In short, it means capability.

Liberal Democrats in politically " safe " districts and states are fixated on pressing ahead, pushed ever forward by their elementary base. But, as Massachusetts Democrats recently organize out, the belief of " safe " districts or states doesn ' t mean what it used to. A thought not irrevocable on more moderate Democrats in more marginal seats.

Each day seems to bring and retirement announcement by added Democrat, major poll appearance Republicans with big leads over executive Democrats, and the American people growing increasingly opposed to Obama ' s programs. All of which makes it harder for Obama to convince enough Democrats to go along with his agenda, as they are all too aware that his name isn ' t on any ballots this fall.

When held Democrats approximative Senator Evan Bayh ( with over thirteen million dollars in the bank ) decide that it ' s too jeopardous to run for re - ballot, the writing is on the close.

But for unselfish Democrats, the design is so tantalizingly airless. Just deem of it - regulatory control over higher 1 / 6th of the US economy in an area that they can extrapolate out to virtually every angle of American life. ( Put that amiable drink down! No more McDonalds for you! ) They ' ve come too abysmal to turn back now.

As for Obama, he knows the Democrats are in for a beating at the polls this November, and he ' s up-to-date fancy about his own re - picking. He will use health care " summit " and its denouement as an opportunity to disingenuously imitate Republicans as being against any reform and on the side of groups Americans antipathy, ( such insurance and pharmaceutical companies ).

For Republicans, this is no time for bi - partiality. Especially inured that bi - partiality much means that Republicans go along with how liberal Democrats want to do things. They need to resist the urge to do concept other than demand that Obama, Pelosi and Reid go back to square one with health care. Current versions of the legislation should be positively off the drink. Further, any more " comprehensive " bills should be published off - limits. " Comprehensive " is a Washington, DC euphemism for legislation that ' s easier to fill with things that the public would never approve of.

Instead, the GOP should demand a series of stand alone bills that promote issues akin as medical malpractice reform, allowing consumers to purchase insurance across state goods, and allowing small businesses to band together to buy insurance. Each of these are issues that are commonly implied to have a tremendous impact on the cost of health care in America. And they ' re all supported by mammoth majorities of the American public. Unlike ObamaCare.

Short of that, congressional Republicans shouldn ' t aversion being labeled as the " party of no ". There are worse things that they could be in the coming ballot.

Just ask the Democrats.